Blockchain in food supply chains: Early successes but hurdles remain

Early applications of blockchain suggest that cross-industry collaboration is becoming the norm

Blockchain technology is being applied to global food supply chains in ways that promise to benefit producers, distributors, retailers and consumers, according to GlobalData.

Cross-industry collaboration has emerged as the dominant model for successful applications. However, most initiatives are in their early stages, and long-term success depends on overcoming several challenges and limitations.

Chris Drake, Principal Technology Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “Blockchain has several characteristics that make it suitable for managing supply chains, including its ability to provide supply chain producers, distributors, retailers and consumers with equal and transparent access to the same stored information. Food supply chain information stored in a blockchain could include the origin or quality of a particular product, and the manner in which it was transported and stored.’’

In addition to providing greater visibility into the contracts and connections that make up complex food supply chains, blockchain allows producers and retailers to guarantee the originality and quality of products, while helping with efforts to identify fraud and illegality within the food chain and facilitating the tracking and recall of defective or contaminated goods.

Drake comments: ‘‘Early applications of blockchain to food supply chains suggest that cross-industry collaboration is becoming the norm, with specific initiatives bringing together IT leaders, technology start-ups, food retailers, NGOs and systems integrators.’’ 

In early October IBM officially launched its blockchain-based food tracking network ‘Food Trust’, whose partners include Carrefour, Nestle, Dole and Unilever.

Drake concludes: ‘‘Despite early apparent successes, the application of blockchain to food supply chains faces several hurdles, including the persistence of entrenched industry interests; potentially prohibitive deployment and operating costs; and the challenge of verifying the authenticity of the data supplied to the blockchain.’’

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author should not be considered as financial advice. We do not give advice on financial products.

Previous Article

House of Nakamoto sets up second Bitcoin shop

Next Article

Ripple’s Chris Larsen tackles regulation and ‘fetish for disruption’

Read More Related articles