“We were trying to contact the attacker but we haven’t got any reply until now,” the post states. “We still don’t know the reason. If the attacker didn’t run it for profit, he might be a white hacker who wanted to remind people the risks in blockchain consensus and hashing power security.”
Last week, Gate.io published its analysis of the 51% attack. Check it out here.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author should not be considered as financial advice. We do not give advice on financial products.