Facebook’s Libra cryptocurrency is “a centralised wolf in decentralised sheep’s clothing,” according to Joseph Lubin, Founder of ConsenSys and Co-founder of Ethereum.
“Trust is a slippery subject, especially when magnified to the scale of a global financial infrastructure.”
Wrote down some reflections on this week's craziness for a piece on @qz. https://t.co/RT4jNTMNtg
— Joseph Lubin (@ethereumJoseph) June 21, 2019
In an article for Quartz, he states that Facebook is painfully aware of the gulf of trust between itself and the public. And that’s likely why the social media itself is hardly mentioned anywhere in its recently unveiled whitepaper or technical documentation.
See also: Lambasting Libra: Six less than enthusiastic responses to Facebook’s crypto move
“Trust is a slippery subject, especially when magnified to the scale of a global financial infrastructure. Ten years ago, the Bitcoin whitepaper proposed that instead of relying “exclusively on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments,” we can instead rely on cryptoeconomic proof. With an internet connection, anyone can participate in the peer-to-peer network and inspect the ledger. Social consensus can protect against a cabal seeking to reverse or censor transactions,” Lubin writes.
“Yet, with the Libra whitepaper, Facebook is not eliminating subjective trust, but imploring us to trust in Libra. You have to trust that one Libra coin will have “intrinsic value” by being backed by a basket of currencies and government bonds, rather than the capriciousness of daily cryptocurrency price swings. Facebook will seek trust from regulators that its Calibra wallet can comply with know-your-customer and anti-money laundering laws by requiring government-issued IDs to verify an account. It will need merchants to trust that their initial network will responsibly run nodes to validate transactions on the system.”
We are also all increasingly aware of how much money Facebook makes from our data, Lubin continues. What happens when you also wrap your personal finances up in this? That our digital identity will never merge with Libra’s financial data is a hard perception to shake. It is almost a given, even if they have the best of intentions—“accidents” and incursions happen when relying on centralised architectures.
Not all bad
Facebook’s arrival in the crypto space could have some positives, however. In a few years’ time, there may be as many as two billion new users onboarded to its Libra crypto wallet. In one fell swoop, talented UX designers could reduce the current friction of using cryptocurrency. Managing private keys, understanding gas payments and installing crypto browser plugins could be as simple as pressing “send” in WhatsApp, another Facebook-owned entity.
But the notion of trust won’t go away, Lubin insists. “As of today, Libra has made a bold promise, and it’s one that Facebook needs to keep. Until then, Libra is like a centralised wolf in a decentralised sheep’s clothing,” he concludes.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author should not be considered as financial advice. We do not give advice on financial products.